Time to Scrap Electives?

Time to Scrap Electives? Four good reasons to finally focus on the real needs of the students
Robin Capehart

Feb 3

In contemporary higher education, the mandate for baccalaureate students to complete between 30 and 42 elective hours is increasingly seen as outdated. The inefficacy of such requirements in today’s career-focused educational landscape highlights the need for reform. In particular, the shift to a career-centric education; the expansiveness of the Internet; the unnecessariness of faculty driven electives; and the financial benefits of lower price and reduced costs.

1. Career-Centric Education

At a Slight Angle is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

In today’s competitive job market, the primary goal of higher education for many parents, students, and employers is the alignment of curricula with specific career pathways. This focus ensures that students acquire the skills and knowledge necessary to succeed in their chosen fields immediately upon graduation.

A 2022 survey by McKinsey & Company revealed that 74% of students and 83% of parents believe that college education should prioritize career preparation over traditional liberal arts education. This sentiment reflects a growing demand for programs that offer practical, hands-on experience and direct pathways to employment.

Elective courses, which often encompass a broad range of topics unrelated to a student’s major, can detract from this goal. These courses consume valuable time and resources that could be better spent on specialized training and the development of industry-relevant skills. For instance, a nursing student might benefit more from additional clinical practice hours than from unrelated electives. Similarly, an aspiring accountant gains little from courses that do not enhance their financial acumen.

Moreover, employers increasingly seek graduates who are ready to contribute from day one. As reported by the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) in 2023, 87% of employers value practical experience over broad academic knowledge. This shift in employer expectations underscores the importance of a curriculum focused on career readiness, making a strong case for reevaluating the necessity and scope of elective coursework in degree programs.

By streamlining curricula to emphasize career-specific education, institutions can better prepare students for the workforce, meeting both student aspirations and market demands.

2. The Internet as a Learning Resource

With the advent of the internet, students now have unparalleled access to a vast array of information and learning resources, transforming the manner in which education is approached and delivered. This digital revolution allows students to explore diverse topics and acquire new skills independently, outside the constraints of formal educational settings.

According to a 2023 Pew Research Center study, 91% of students use online platforms to supplement their education, a testament to the internet’s integral role in learning today.

Online resources such as MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses), educational YouTube channels, and platforms like Coursera, Khan Academy, and edX provide courses on nearly any subject imaginable. These platforms offer flexibility, allowing students to learn at their own pace and tailor their education to fit their specific interests and career goals.

This accessibility significantly reduces the necessity for formal elective courses traditionally required in college curricula. Instead of enrolling in a broad array of electives to achieve a well-rounded education, students can selectively engage with online content that directly aligns with their interests and needs. Moreover, many online courses are designed by industry professionals, ensuring that the material is current and relevant to today’s job market.

Additionally, the internet fosters a culture of lifelong learning. Students are encouraged to continually update their knowledge and skills, making them more adaptable and competitive in a rapidly changing world. By leveraging these resources, students can achieve the breadth of knowledge that elective courses aim to provide, without the associated time and financial costs.

This shift calls for a reevaluation of traditional educational models, recognizing the internet’s role in democratizing knowledge and empowering students to take control of their educational journeys.

3. Faculty-Centric Course Offerings

Elective requirements often exist more to support faculty interests than to address student needs. This issue arises because faculty members frequently design and offer courses that align with their specialized research interests, rather than the broader educational needs of students.

According to a 2021 report by the American Association of University Professors, 63% of faculty admitted that they offer niche courses primarily based on personal expertise rather than on student demand or relevance to career preparation.

This misalignment suggests that the current educational system prioritizes institutional goals and faculty preferences over the practical needs of students. Faculty-driven course offerings can lead to an abundance of classes with limited applicability to most students’ career paths, forcing students to enroll in electives that do not enhance their professional skills or job readiness.

Moreover, this approach can divert resources away from developing and expanding courses that are in higher demand or that align more closely with evolving industry standards. As a result, students may find themselves struggling to access courses that would better prepare them for the workforce, potentially affecting their competitiveness in the job market.

Furthermore, the persistence of such a system can contribute to student dissatisfaction, as they may feel that their educational journey is being dictated by institutional priorities rather than their own aspirations and career goals. To address this, academic institutions need to consider restructuring their curricula to better reflect student interests and market demands, ensuring that elective offerings are both relevant and beneficial to student development.

4. Financial Implications

Students often incur significant debt for courses that may not directly contribute to their career goals, exacerbating the financial strain of higher education.

According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) in 2022, the average student debt reached $37,000, a substantial burden that impacts graduates’ financial stability and career choices.

Unnecessary elective requirements can inflate the cost of education by extending the time needed to complete a degree and by requiring payment for courses that do not enhance a student’s professional skill set. This not only increases tuition expenses but also adds to ancillary costs such as textbooks and fees, further deepening student debt.

Reducing such elective requirements could significantly alleviate these financial burdens. By streamlining degree programs to focus on essential career-specific courses, institutions can help students complete their education more efficiently and cost-effectively. This approach would allow students to allocate their financial resources toward courses and experiences that directly advance their career readiness, such as internships, certifications, and specialized training.

Moreover, by minimizing student debt, graduates are better positioned to make life choices that are not constrained by financial obligations. They can pursue job opportunities based on interest and fit rather than necessity, contribute to savings and investments, and potentially pursue further education without the looming pressure of debt repayment.

Overall, reevaluating and reducing elective requirements could play a crucial role in making higher education more accessible and aligned with the economic realities faced by today’s students. This shift would enhance the value of a college education, ensuring it serves as a true investment in a student’s future.

Going forward . . .

In summary, scrapping the requirement of electives or finding an alternative model is a pressing consideration in modern education. The traditional model of requiring extensive elective coursework is increasingly seen as misaligned with the primary goals of higher education, which are to prepare students for specific career paths and to ensure financial viability.

1. Career Alignment

The primary objective of higher education should be to equip students with the skills and knowledge necessary for their chosen careers. Elective courses often do not contribute to this goal. By eliminating or reducing these requirements, institutions can focus more on career-specific training and skills development, ensuring graduates are better prepared for the workforce.

2. Financial Considerations

With the average student debt reaching significant levels, reducing elective requirements can help lower the cost of obtaining a degree. Students can complete their education more quickly and with fewer financial burdens, allowing them to allocate resources toward experiences that directly enhance their employability, such as internships and professional certifications.

3. Alternative Models

– Personalized Learning Paths: Institutions could offer more personalized curricula, allowing students to choose courses that align directly with their career goals and personal interests, supported by academic advisors.

– Integrated Learning: Courses could integrate elements of traditional electives into core subjects, providing breadth without requiring separate courses.

– Modular Education: Implementing a modular approach where students can select from a variety of short courses or workshops that add relevant skills without the commitment of full electives.

– Online and Hybrid Options: Encouraging the use of online platforms to explore diverse subjects independently, thus maintaining educational breadth without formal coursework.

4. Industry Collaboration

Collaborating with industries to design curricula that reflect current and future job market needs can ensure that students are learning relevant skills. This partnership can lead to the development of courses that replace electives with practical, industry-aligned content.

By reconsidering the role of electives and exploring alternative models, educational institutions can better align their programs with student needs and market demands, ultimately creating a more efficient and effective educational system.

Time to Scrap Electives? – by Robin Capehart

Home – Collegiate Consulting